It's
black, it's round, and it goes on the wheel
Tires are a mysterious thing -- think about it. A reinforced bladder
with about thirty pounds of air is all that keeps your motorcycle
from rolling on it's bare metal rims. That thin bit of rubber is what
lets you get out there and enjoy a good ride. Obviously, it pays to
know about your tires.
There are a few basic elements to consider when looking at tires.
The type of tire, the size, the profile, and the aspect ratio are
all elements that can affect the behaviour of the tire, and thus the
behaviour of the bike. We'll take these elements and go through them,
and the effect that they can have on your bike.
The most apparent difference between tires is the size and aspect
ratio. These are indicated by the numbers on the side of the tire,
usually something along the lines of "120/80V-16" or "4.50H-16".
There is also a alphanumeric system that would look something like
"MR80H-16". So what do all these numbers mean?
Let's take a look at the most common designation, the metric system
for tires. This is the one that reads "120/80V-16". This
type of designation is the most commonly used nowadays, and would
break down as follows:
| 120/80V-16 |
The "120" is the nominal
width of the tire, in millimeters.
The "80" is the aspect ratio, expressed as a percentage
of the width.
The "V" is the speed rating for the tire.
The "16" is the diameter of the wheel that the tire
is constructed for. |
So, we can look at a tire and read a little bit of the code. But how
do the numbers interrelate? Here's the scoop –
The nominal width is approximately how wide the tire is at the widest
part of the tread. In this case, the width is about 120 mm. There
is some variance from tire maker to tire maker, and from brand to
brand, so one tire may be 124 mm wide, while another may be 118 mm.
The aspect ratio is approximately how tall the tire is in relationship
to its width. Thus, a 120/80 tire is about 95 mm tall, from the bead
to the tread surface.
The speed rating indicates at what maximum speed the tire is considered
safe for continuous use. In this instance, the V stand for speeds
up to 149 mph. A table of speed ratings is listed below. The last
number is the diameter of the wheel that the tire is intended for.
In this case, we are talking about a 16 inch rim for the tire.
The second example above reads "4.50H-16". This is the so
called American system, and reads as follows:
4.50 -- the nominal width of the tire in inches. In this case, about
4.5 inches, or about 120 mm.
H -- The speed rating, in this case indicating a tire safe up to 130
mph.
16 -- This tire is intended for a 16 inch rim.
The American system is a little quirky when it comes to aspect ratio.
Generally, a tire is a high profile tire, with about a 90% aspect
ratio, unless the width is indicated with a ".10" or ".60"
designation. This indicates a lower profile tire, on the order of
75-85 percent. Thus, a 4.5 inch tire with a 85 percent aspect ration
would be shown as a 4.60. A 4.0 inch low profile tire would be a 4.10.
The last method of tire designation is the British system, which we
showed above as "MR80S-16". This breaks down like so:
MR -- This is a letter code indicating the width of the tire. In this
instance, MR indicates a 120mm tire.
80 -- Once again, the aspect ration, expressed as a percentage of
the width.
H -- The speed rating, once again for 130mph sustained running.
16 -- The diameter of the wheel that this tire is intended for.
Since the British system uses an alpha code for the tire width, a
table is included below to indicate what metric and American widths
are included. The table also includes the recommended rim widths for
those tire widths.
Here's all the tables I've been speaking of:
Speed Ratings:
| Unrated |
95mph |
| S |
112mph |
| T |
118mph |
| H |
130mph |
| V |
149mph |
| Z |
above 149mph |
Tire Size Conversions (Courtesy of the Dennis Kirk Catalog, and they
probably don't even know it):
| Permissible Rim Widths (In Inches) |
Metric Width (In mm) |
Standard Width (in) |
Standard Low Profile |
Alpha Numeric Codes |
| 1.60, 1.85 |
70 |
2.75 |
- |
MG |
| 1.60, 1.85 |
80 |
3.00 |
3.60 |
MH |
| 1.60, 1.85 |
80 |
3.00 |
3.60 |
MH |
| 1.85, 2.15 |
90 |
3.25 |
3.60 |
MJ |
| 1.85, 2.15 |
90 |
3.50 |
4.10 |
ML |
| 2.15, 2.50 |
100 |
3.75 |
4.10 |
MM |
| 2.15, 2.50, 2.75 |
110 |
4.00 |
4.60 |
MN |
| 2.15, 2.50, 2.75 |
110 |
4.25 |
4.25/85 |
MP |
| 2.15, 2.50, 2.75 |
120 |
4.50 |
4.25/85 |
MR |
| 2.15, 2.50, 2.75 |
120 |
4.75 |
5.10 |
MS |
| 2.50, 2.75, 3.00 |
130 |
5.00 |
5.10 |
MT |
| 2.75, 3.00, 3.50 |
140 |
5.50 |
- |
MU |
| 3.00, 3.50 |
150 |
6.00 |
- |
MW |
| 3.00, 3.50, 4.00 |
160 |
- |
- |
- |
Over 4.00 inches, I have no data. I will add it when I find it.
Okay, so we've got the codes... but what does it mean? How does a
130/80-16 differ from a 120/80-16, if both can fit on the same size
rim?
First of all, the most obvious characteristic is the width of the
tire. The width, in concert with the diameter of the wheel, determines
the size of the contact patch. The size of the contact patch in turn
determines the load that the tire can bear, the amount of traction
that will be available, how well the tire disperses water, and how
mush it resists steering inputs.
The diameter of the wheel and tire, in addition to the effect on the
contact patch, affects the steering and stability of the bike. A larger
wheel will be more stable at speed, and more resistant to steering
inputs. This is in part due to the greater gyroscopic effect, but
another factor is the greater contact patch caused by the larger wheel.
In essence, a larger diameter wheel creates a longer contact patch,
which requires more leverage to move.
The aspect ratio of the tire is the distance from the bead of the
tire to the tread surface. The primary effect of the aspect ratio
is on the shape of the tire. In general, a lower aspect ratio results
in a flatter profile.
The profile of the tire is the cross sectional shape. It is affected
by several elements: the aspect ratio, the wheel width, the width
of the tire, and the manufacturers intentions for the tire all affect
the profile. The profile in turn affects the handling. A triangular
profile will cause the bike to turn in more easily, but may make it
a little more prone to tucking or falling into the turn. On the other
hand, a rounder profile may be a little more difficult to turn in,
but might have a little more linear response to steering inputs. This
is to a great extent motorcycle dependent -- some bikes may like a
particular tire, others may not.
All in all, this means that a wider tire will tend to steer more heavily,
but will also offer more traction. A larger rim will also steer slower,
as will a broad, relatively flat tire.
So, what does all this mean when it comes time to go out and buy the
tire? Well, it means a lot. First of all, in many cases the tire selection
may be limited by the wheels on the bike, or the age and style of
the bike. An excellent example of these limitations is found when
attempting to find tires for a pre-1994 EX500, or for a Ninja 600
(NOT the ZX-6). Both of these bikes have relatively narrow 16 inch
rims, but they are also meant to be more sporting motorcycles. The
selection of quality rubber for these bikes is pretty much limited
to either Dunlop K591s or Metzler ME33/ME1 tires.
In other cases, while the hardware may be capable of supporting a
more current tire, the optimal sizes are not available. A good example
of this is the 1986 VF1000R (My personal bike at this time)that has
a 2.75x16.0 inch front wheel and a 3.50x17.0 inch rear wheel. The
fitment of rear tires is not a problem -- any of the quality 140,
150, or 160 width raials will fir nicely. The slightly narrow front,
however, really ors best with a bias-ply tire. (FWIW -- I am currently
running Michelin 89 series radials, front and rear, but I had to do
a little tweaking to make them work. More on that later...).
And that brings us to an important matter for tire buyers -- should
I buy a radial tire? The answer is a firm "maybe". First
of all, it helps to know the difference between a radial and a bias
ply tire. To understand the difference, it helps to know a little
bit about tire construction.
A tire is nothing more than a bladder for air. It is made of rubber
reinforced with some sort of fiber (once they were reinforced with
canvas, now they're reinforced with kevlar -- times have changed).
The rubber keeps the air in, and the fiber keeps the tire together,
in addition to importing shape characteristics to the tire. The fibers
are layed out in layers, each layer consisting of fibers lain in parallel,
and impregnanted with rubber. (Martyn -- I'll dredge up some photos
for this, if you want) The final element is the bead, which is simply
a wire put around the edge of the tire to help it clamp to the rim.
The way these layers are placed on the tire is what determines whether
the tire is a bias-ply or radial tire. In short, a radial is a tire
where the threads in the ply are lain perpendicularly to the bead.
This gives them the appearance of radiating from the center of the
tire, thus the term radial. Bias ply tires are a little different,
because the angle of the fibers is at a bias to the bad, usually at
an angle of about 70 degrees. For reference, a "zero degree"
layer would be a belt around the circumference of the tire.
Okay, so what does it mean? Well, a bias-ply tire requires a minimum
of two layers to support the sidewall and the tread. The layers are
fairly stiff, and essentially must scissor against each other to flex.
This makes the tire run hotter. A radial tire needs only one ply,
and thus is not only softer, but runs much cooler, and weighs less
to boot. Advantages all around -- lighter, cooler, more compliant.
This means that not only can you run a softer compound for radials,
but it will provide better grip since it can conform to the road better.
Great!
But wait! There's a catch -- radial tires require wider rims to support
the same tire width. That means that a 120/80 bias ply tire would
work on a 2.5 inch rim, but a 120/80 radial would need a 3.0 inch
rim to support it properly. Why does a radial need a wider rim? In
simplest terms, a radial tends to have a softer sidewall, and a wider
rim with a similar aspect radial puts less load on the sidewall, causing
it to distort less under load. Most radials are designed for wider
wheels, and putting them on a narrower rim will distort the cross-section
of the tire and affect the hndling of the bike -- almost always negatively.
********************************
METZELER TIRE ***************
Update: 4/97 Z * *****
THIS IS GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY, SOME MANUFACTURERS ARE DIFFERENT
*****
SPEED RATING FOR TIRES:
===================================
| R - TO 106 MPH |
H - TO 130 MPH |
| S - TO 112 MPH |
V - TO 149 MPH |
| T - TO 118 MPH |
Z - ABOVE 149 MPH |
| H RATED TIRES ARE
NORMALLY FOR TOUR BIKES |
| V & Z ARE NORMALLY
FOR SPORT BIKES |
| R & S RATED TIRES
ARE GENERALLY FOR DUAL SPORT BIKES |
| B = BELTED, R = RADIAL |
DEFINITION OF ASPECT
RATIO:
In a 130/90X18 tire the 90 is the aspect ratio. It is a measure
of the height as a percentage of the width. The lower the middle
number the lower the profile of the tire ("the wider the
tire"). |
***************** STREET TIRE SIZE CONVERSION CHART ***************
| FRONT TIRES: |
METRIC |
INCH |
ALPHA NUMERIC |
| |
====== |
========= |
======= |
| |
80/90 |
2.50/2.75 |
MH90 |
| |
90/90 |
2.75/3.00 |
MJ90 |
| |
100/90 |
3.25/3.50 |
MM90 |
| |
110/90 |
3.75/4.00 |
MN90 |
| |
120/80 |
4.25/4.50 |
---- |
| |
120/90 |
4.25/4.50 |
MR90 |
| |
130/90 |
5.00/5.10 |
MT90 |
| REAR TIRES: |
====== |
========= |
======= |
| |
110/90 |
4.00/4.25 |
MP85 |
| |
120/90 |
4.50/4.75 |
MR90 |
| |
130/80 |
5.00/5.10 |
---- |
| |
130/90 |
5.00/5.10 |
MT90 |
| |
140/80 |
5.50/6.00 |
---- |
| |
140/90 |
5.50/6.00 |
MU90 |
| |
150/80 |
6.00/6.25 |
MV85 |
| |
150/90 |
6.00/6.25 |
MV85 |
Metzeler ML2 and ML2 Plus
Thicker ply material in carcas for greater stability and less heat
build up
Newly formulated compound for greater mileage
Excellent wet weather grip and straight line stability
Front tire has no center grove to reduce the sensitivity to rain groves
Solid center rear tire puts more rubber on the road and increases
mileage
Metzeler claims mileage of 14,000 to 16,000 under normal wear
This is Metzeler's best touring tire
Metzeler ML2 and ML2 Plus
Order # Price...... Description......
(09984) $120.95 Metzeler ML2 Plus 140/80HB15
(09208) $126.95 Metzeler ML2 Plus 150/90HB15
(09200) $120.95 Metzeler ML2 Plus 140/90HB16
(09179) $137.95 Metzeler ML2 Plus 160/80HB16
Order # Price...... Description......
(19836) $104.95 Metzeler ML2 130/90H16 Front
(19837) $97.95 Metzeler ML2 120/80H17 Front
(19838) $102.95 Metzeler ML2 120/90HB18 Front
(19839) $109.95 Metzeler ML2 130/70HB18 Front

|
|